**Overall Verdict:** Accept — The revision is complete, professionally scoped, reachable, and objectively evaluable, with only minor documentation and evaluator-hardening opportunities.

**Completeness Check:**
- Instruction: Complete — The task prompt, specification, and delivery order define channel routing, control handling, timing conversion, output formats, byte layouts, text rules, and deliverables.
- Inputs: Complete — The SCC contains 75 monotonic events with valid drop-frame labels, odd parity throughout, both caption channels, and the documented XDS, roll-up, and mid-row cases.
- Toolchain: Complete — Linux and Python 3.12 standard library provide a legally obtainable, dependency-free, single-machine implementation path.
- Reference output: Complete — All four required references are present; the STL has one 1,024-byte ASCII GSI and twelve 128-byte TTIs, while both SRTs and the report contain the expected cue data.
- Rubric: Complete — The static evaluator defines hard structural gates, exact and tolerance-based comparisons, weighted partial credit, malformed-output handling, and hidden-reference separation.

**File and Task Reachability:**
The attachment set is `reachable`, and the end-to-end task is `reachable`. Both ZIP attachments matched their declared sizes, were valid, unencrypted, low-expansion archives without traversal paths, links, devices, duplicate members, or integrity errors. Inspected content included `input/delivery_order.txt`, `input/master_enfr.scc`, `input/spec_sheet.md`; all four `reference` outputs; both evaluator source files; all four `naive_try` outputs; `task_card.json`; and the three submitted logs. No content was left unreviewed. The evaluator was statically inspected rather than executed, as required by safe-review policy; independent data parsing confirmed the principal SCC, SRT, report, and STL relationships. The review environment lacked Python, but that does not affect task reachability. A solver can decode the SCC, create the four outputs with Python standard library code, and receive deterministic evaluation from the packaged reader and evaluator. License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor. Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.

**Special Screening:**
None

**Recommended Changes:**
The submission is ready; no material changes are required. As optional cleanup, change the isolated `task_card.json` checklist reference from “BCD timecodes” to “unsigned binary timecodes.” It would also help to state explicitly that trailing blank caption-screen cells are trimmed and spacing mid-row attributes retain their displayed space. Evaluator hardening could additionally validate French report frame columns and otherwise-unused TTI status fields.