**Overall Verdict:** Accept — the task is complete, internally consistent, reachable on one machine, and objectively evaluable with the supplied local artifacts.

**Completeness Check:**
- Instruction: Complete — specifies extraction scope, database/output artifacts, permitted domains, zone canonicalization, scene numbering, and required CSV schema.
- Inputs: Complete — `pericles_script.txt` is readable ASCII text, 106,219 bytes, and contains 22 explicit scene headers.
- Toolchain: Complete — Python 3.12 standard library and SQLite3 are sufficient; no credentials or network services are required.
- Reference output: Complete — the CSV is readable, has the required six-column schema, contains 99 valid unique tuples covering all 22 scenes, and uses only permitted domains.
- Rubric: Complete — the grader checks database presence and populated tables, exact headers, domain and scene coverage, and 80% recall/precision thresholds.

**File and Task Reachability:**
Attachment classification: `reachable`. Task classification: `reachable`. I inspected the complete contents of `pericles_script.txt`, `pericles_golden_continuity_log.csv`, and `grader_script.py`; all match their declared plain-text formats and sizes. The script, reference CSV, and grader are parseable without execution, and no archives, encryption, unsafe links, credentials, or unreviewed attachment content were present. No reviewer-tooling limitation prevented inspection. The end-to-end path is clear: parse the script, populate `pericles_spatial.db`, export the six-column continuity CSV, then run the local grader against the reference output.

License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor.  
Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.

**Special Screening:**
`public_benchmark` — the input is explicitly the canonical Shakespeare *Pericles* text, making the source material publicly identifiable. The custom continuity reference and exact benchmark publication status were not independently verified because no public search was performed. Keeping evaluation offline mitigates retrieval of externally hosted solutions; the custom reference remains evaluator-side evidence.

**Recommended Changes:**
The submission is coherent and ready; no contributor changes are required. Optional evaluator hardening could validate required table columns and relationships rather than only checking that at least two populated tables exist.