{"claim":{"id":"5bdd449a-9c39-470a-9a05-d7e9ffc36569","submission_id":"2e4414db-60f6-4e59-8d7e-86be1c585c5e","submission_revision_id":"4fcd53f9-6971-4615-b5df-4e3dc412af92","builder":"builder-01","status":"active","claimed_at":"2026-10-15T15:07:18.377149Z","delivered_at":null,"ended_at":null,"delivery_note":null,"end_reason":null},"task":{"submission_id":"2e4414db-60f6-4e59-8d7e-86be1c585c5e","submission_revision_id":"4fcd53f9-6971-4615-b5df-4e3dc412af92","revision_version":3,"submission_status":"under_review","submitted_at":"2026-08-17T00:52:26.630385Z","submitter_name":"Yuxuan Zhang","submitter_email":"esiec2020@gmail.com","task":{"status":"submitted","version":3,"extra_fields":{},"submitted_at":"2026-08-17T00:52:26.630385+00:00","industry_domain":"Trade Compliance / Export Controls","task_short_name":"restricted_party_screening_casebook_1","operating_system":"Linux","task_description":"Objective: Certify a frozen batch of 16 synthetic shipment cases by screening all 32 consignee, end-user, and freight-forwarder parties against the supplied 25,939-row, point-in-time U.S. International Trade Administration Consolidated Screening List (CSL). Apply screening_policy.json exactly, retain audit evidence, and assign every shipment CLEAR, REVIEW, or HOLD. These are benchmark workflow labels, not legal authorization or advice.\n\nStarting state: The input archive contains the frozen CSL, shipment_parties.csv, screening_policy.json, a corrected SHA-256 SOURCE_MANIFEST.json, frozen official ITA description and terms pages, and OUTPUT_CONTRACT.md. The shipment queue is entirely synthetic. Twelve seeded strings are deterministic variants of public CSL rows; all remaining counterparties are purpose-built negative controls. No real transaction, customer, employer, agency, confidential, or personal data is included.\n\nInstructions: Normalize names and aliases using Unicode NFKD, remove combining marks, casefold, replace every run outside ASCII [a-z0-9] with one space, and collapse whitespace. Retain exact normalized-sequence or exact sorted-token candidates. Geography corroboration requires either a nonblank/non-ZZ two-letter party country found under the published source-country regex, or a submitted normalized address of at least 12 characters where either normalized address equals or contains the other. A corroborated match is strong/HOLD; an uncorroborated name match is weak/REVIEW; no qualifying match is CLEAR. Aggregate shipments using HOLD > REVIEW > CLEAR. Do not refresh the list or use a live API. Preserve source IDs; never invent evidence.\n\nDeliver exactly four files and no extras: party_screening.jsonl, shipment_disposition.csv, case_evidence.csv, and run_manifest.json. OUTPUT_CONTRACT.md is normative for exact schemas, enums, field types, ordering, candidate ranking, CSV serialization, and manifest keys; it exposes no answer rows.","software_licensing":"Free/Open Source","evaluation_criteria":null,"verification_method":"Binary scoring: 100 only if every condition passes; otherwise 0. The independent verifier rebuilds the frozen CSL index, requires exactly four top-level output files, rejects blank JSONL records, enforces exact JSON object/nested-candidate schemas and CSV headers/order, requires type(value) is bool for geography flags and non-boolean integers for candidate_count and all manifest counts, and checks matching rules, all 32 party and 16 shipment outcomes, every evidence row, snapshot date, counts, policy identity, and hashes. Two clean runs are byte-identical and score 100/100. Seventeen executed corruptions are rejected, including boolean/integer substitution, integer-valued floats, blank JSONL records, missing files, and extra files.","software_and_version":"Python 3.10+; DuckDB 0.9+ or equivalent; spreadsheet application","specific_requirements":null,"expected_completion_time":null},"files":[{"file_id":"d565351e-ff86-40ca-a922-da3f0957170b","filename":"ALE_044_Reference_and_Evaluation.zip","category":"reference_output","content_type":"application/zip","size_bytes":14105},{"file_id":"6d704b2e-5ed8-4625-b037-f0a3d79c960c","filename":"ALE_044_Input_Materials_Type_Strict.zip","category":"input_materials","content_type":"application/zip","size_bytes":2500286}],"deep_review":{"overall_verdict":"Strong Accept","review_text":"**Overall Verdict:** Strong Accept — The submission is complete, internally coherent, reproducible, objectively evaluable, and free of material reachability or integrity risks.\n\n**Completeness Check:**\n\n- Instruction: Complete — The task, deterministic matching rules, audit requirements, ordering, and exact four-file end state are unambiguous.\n- Inputs: Complete — The frozen 25,939-row CSL, 32-party shipment queue, policy, authoritative hashes, provenance dossier, and frozen official pages are present and consistent.\n- Toolchain: Complete — Python 3.10+ and optional open-source analytical tools provide a practical offline Linux workflow without paid services.\n- Reference output: Complete — All four populated reference artifacts have valid schemas, expected counts and types, matching hashes, and consistent party, shipment, and evidence outcomes.\n- Rubric: Complete — The implementation-neutral binary rubric is backed by an independent outcome verifier and 17 documented rejection tests.\n\n**File and Task Reachability:**\n\nThe attachment classification is `reachable`, and the end-to-end task classification is `reachable`. Both declared ZIP attachments were inspected: `ALE_044_Input_Materials_Type_Strict.zip` (2,500,286 bytes) and `ALE_044_Reference_and_Evaluation.zip` (14,105 bytes). Each contains 11 entries, is readable, unencrypted, CRC-clean, and has no unsafe paths, links, devices, or excessive expansion.\n\nAll members were reviewed, including `TASK_TECHNICAL_DRAFT.md`, `SOURCE_LICENSE_DOSSIER.md`, `OUTPUT_CONTRACT.md`, `shipment_parties.csv`, `SOURCE_MANIFEST.json`, `screening_policy.json`, `csl-2026-08-16.csv`, both frozen HTML pages, all four reference outputs, `evaluation_rubric.json`, `VALIDATION_RESULTS.json`, `DERIVATION_PROVENANCE.json`, and both validation scripts as inert text. No content remained unreviewed. The CSVs parse consistently: 25,939 CSL records across 29 fields and 32 unique parties across 16 shipments. Authoritative input, source-page, and reference-output hashes match the submitted files. Independent recomputation matched all 32 party results; the 16 shipment rows and 12 evidence rows are internally exact and correctly ordered.\n\nThe reviewer environment lacked Python, so the supplied verifier was not executed during review. This is a reviewer-tooling limitation, not a submission defect; the verifier was fully inspected, uses the Python standard library, rebuilds outcomes from frozen solver inputs, and provides an objective evaluation path. An ordinary user can process the local inputs, generate the four contracted outputs, and be evaluated without network access or external coordination. License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor. Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.\n\n**Special Screening:**\n\nNone\n\n**Recommended Changes:**\n\nThe frozen data, provenance record, output contract, reference set, and independent verifier are professionally constructed and mutually consistent. No changes are required.","reviewed_at":"2026-08-17T01:00:37.148707Z"},"claim":{"id":"5bdd449a-9c39-470a-9a05-d7e9ffc36569","submission_id":"2e4414db-60f6-4e59-8d7e-86be1c585c5e","submission_revision_id":"4fcd53f9-6971-4615-b5df-4e3dc412af92","builder":"builder-01","status":"active","claimed_at":"2026-10-15T15:07:18.377149Z","delivered_at":null,"ended_at":null,"delivery_note":null,"end_reason":null}},"revision_is_current":true}