{"claim":{"id":"58cc62cf-612a-4a48-9bb4-d1614d21655b","submission_id":"0ec2c23b-2cab-4c07-a6ff-20bc4e6efe7f","submission_revision_id":"4ada3a1e-bb03-465e-aa64-7f03856057bb","builder":"builder-01","status":"active","claimed_at":"2026-10-15T15:12:18.156479Z","delivered_at":null,"ended_at":null,"delivery_note":null,"end_reason":null},"task":{"submission_id":"0ec2c23b-2cab-4c07-a6ff-20bc4e6efe7f","submission_revision_id":"4ada3a1e-bb03-465e-aa64-7f03856057bb","revision_version":2,"submission_status":"under_review","submitted_at":"2026-08-25T15:12:59.483157Z","submitter_name":"Yunshi Zhang","submitter_email":"1785948079zys@gmail.com","task":{"status":"submitted","version":2,"extra_fields":{},"submitted_at":"2026-08-25T15:12:59.483157+00:00","industry_domain":"Communication Engineering","task_short_name":"oai_5g_core_ueransim_validation","operating_system":"Linux","task_description":"Objective: Deploy and validate an OAI open-source 5G Core network, simulate UE access, and analyze normal and failed authentication procedures.\nStarting State: An Ubuntu 22.04 LTS host with Docker, Docker Compose, Wireshark, the oai-cn5g-fed release of OAI 5G Core, and UERANSIM for simulating a gNB and UE.\nInstructions & Rules: Configure IP forwarding and iptables, deploy the basic OAI 5G Core with the AMF, SMF, and UPF services, and confirm that all containers are running normally. Configure the UERANSIM gNB and UE with matching IP, PLMN, network-slice, IMSI, and authentication-key settings. Register the simulated UE, record its assigned IP address, and verify external connectivity with a ping test. Use Wireshark to capture and analyze the UE registration sequence and GTP-U user-plane traffic. Finally, deliberately introduce an authentication-data mismatch and confirm that the UE registration fails with an authentication failure message.","software_licensing":"Free/Open Source","evaluation_criteria":null,"verification_method":"Strict Evaluation Rules\nThe agent output receives a score of 1.0 only if every hard requirement below passes. Otherwise, the score is 0.0.\n1. Required files\n   The submission must contain:\n   - result_manifest.json\n   - evidence/core_status.json\n   - evidence/ue_registration.json\n   - evidence/registration_signaling.json\n   - evidence/user_plane_gtp.json\n   - evidence/authentication_failure.json\n   - Three non-empty runtime logs\n   - Three valid .pcapng captures for successful registration, GTP-U traffic, and authentication failure\n2. Core-network health\n   core_status.json and the corresponding log must show AMF, SMF, and UPF in running, healthy, or up state.\n3. Successful UE registration\n   The evidence must show that:\n   - UE registration succeeded.\n   - The UE received a syntactically valid IPv4 address.\n   - An external ping completed successfully.\n   Runtime IP addresses may differ from the reference report.\n4. Registration signaling\n   The registration capture must contain the following messages in this order. Additional messages are allowed:\n   1. Registration Request\n   2. Authentication Request\n   3. Authentication Response\n   4. Security Mode Command\n   5. Security Mode Complete\n   6. Registration Accept\n   7. Registration Complete\n5. GTP-U user-plane traffic\n   The user-plane capture and summary must demonstrate:\n   - GTP-U traffic is present.\n   - At least one TEID is observable.\n   - Encapsulated IP traffic is present.\n   - Ping traffic passes through the user-plane tunnel.\n6. Authentication-failure scenario\n   The agent must deliberately introduce a subscriber authentication mismatch. The evidence must show that registration did not succeed and must contain an Authentication Failure indication. NGSetupFailure alone does not satisfy this requirement.\n7. Capture validity\n   Each capture must:\n   - Have a valid PCAP or PCAPNG header.\n   - Contain real packets and not be an empty or placeholder file.\n   - Agree with its corresponding JSON summary and runtime log.\n8. Evidence integrity\n   - All manifest paths must be relative and remain inside the submission directory.\n   - Placeholder values such as REPLACE_WITH_* are forbidden.\n   - Screenshots alone are insufficient.\n   - Claims unsupported by logs or packet captures must fail.\n   - Reference screenshots are contextual examples and must not be copied as agent-generated evidence.","software_and_version":"Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Docker, Docker-compose, OAI 5G Core Oai-cn5g-fed, UERANSIM, Wireshark","specific_requirements":null,"expected_completion_time":null},"files":[{"file_id":"27d98e48-0bd5-45d1-b3ad-85a124fb5e0b","filename":"oai_5g_core_ueransim_validation_Input_Materials.zip","category":"input_materials","content_type":"application/x-zip-compressed","size_bytes":8341},{"file_id":"e4e5ca84-4c79-4023-b232-933d42d8c933","filename":"oai_5g_core_ueransim_validation_Reference_Output_and_Evaluation_Dependencies.zip","category":"reference_output","content_type":"application/x-zip-compressed","size_bytes":1095166}],"deep_review":{"overall_verdict":"Accept","review_text":"**Overall Verdict:** Accept — The task is complete, professionally scoped, objectively evaluable, and reachable, with only routine evaluator-hardening issues.\n\n**Completeness Check:**\n- Instruction: Complete — The deployment, successful registration, user-plane validation, and controlled authentication-failure outcomes are explicit.\n- Inputs: Complete — Parameter worksheets, evidence templates, path contracts, and safe laboratory-data guidance are supplied; upstream software is appropriately part of the declared starting state.\n- Toolchain: Complete — The workflow uses legally obtainable open-source software on a feasible single-machine Ubuntu environment.\n- Reference output: Complete — Sanitized contextual evidence, explicit limitations, expected artifact contracts, and evaluator-only dependencies are clearly separated.\n- Rubric: Complete — Binary hard gates cover required files, core health, registration, ordered signaling, GTP-U traffic, failed authentication, capture validity, and evidence reconciliation.\n\n**File and Task Reachability:**\nAttachment classification: `partially_reachable`. Task classification: `reachable`. Both uploaded archives were inspected, including every member: the input manifest, output contract, README, task description, four YAML worksheets, result manifest template, five JSON evidence templates, evaluator and test source, evaluation contract and documentation, dependency declaration, extracted report, reference claims and audit, seven PNG figures, and three PCAP fixtures. The ZIP byte counts match the manifest; CRC tests passed; entries were unencrypted regular files with safe relative paths and modest expansion. JSON parsed successfully, text encodings were readable, PNG dimensions and visible contents matched their audit descriptions, and each PCAP had a valid little-endian PCAP header with two internally length-consistent Ethernet records. No content was left unreviewed. Submitted programs were inspected statically and not executed. `tshark` was unavailable in the review environment, so protocol-level fixture decoding and the evaluator self-test could not be independently run; this is a reviewer-tooling limitation rather than a submission defect. Solver inputs and evaluator/reference materials are distinctly packaged, and the end-to-end path from deployment through logs, captures, structured summaries, and binary evaluation is viable. License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor. Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.\n\n**Special Screening:**\nNone. No affirmative evidence supports a screening label; public-benchmark status was not externally searched because that is outside the permitted evidence boundary.\n\n**Recommended Changes:**\nThe submission correctly replaces weak screenshot-only claims with fresh logs and packet-level evidence requirements. No material contributor revision is required. Before production scoring, routine evaluator hardening should anchor the `0% packet loss` check so it cannot match `100% packet loss`, require affirmative ping replies rather than any `icmp_seq=` text, reject negated core-status lines such as “not running,” and initialize the authentication-failure template with `registration_succeeded: false`.","reviewed_at":"2026-08-25T15:22:16.479173Z"},"claim":{"id":"58cc62cf-612a-4a48-9bb4-d1614d21655b","submission_id":"0ec2c23b-2cab-4c07-a6ff-20bc4e6efe7f","submission_revision_id":"4ada3a1e-bb03-465e-aa64-7f03856057bb","builder":"builder-01","status":"active","claimed_at":"2026-10-15T15:12:18.156479Z","delivered_at":null,"ended_at":null,"delivery_note":null,"end_reason":null}},"revision_is_current":true}