**Overall Verdict:** Accept — The submission is complete, professionally rigorous, and end-to-end reachable; only negligible historical references to the retired risk deliverable remain.

**Completeness Check:**
- Instruction: Complete — The instructions define nine global conventions, 18 extraction fields, amendment reconciliation, two required workbooks, and nine portfolio answer rows.
- Inputs: Complete — The agent bundle contains the declared five agreements, three amendments, instructions, questions, templates, and company reference.
- Toolchain: Complete — LibreOffice, Tesseract, and Python with the open-source `openpyxl` dependency provide a viable Linux workflow without network access or commercial software.
- Reference output: Complete — Frozen tracker and portfolio keys are present, populated, structurally compatible with the templates, and supported by clause-cited adjudication notes and provenance records.
- Rubric: Complete — The scoring script and configuration objectively cover exact amendment mapping, the 90-cell extraction threshold, and all nine portfolio rows, including order-insensitive set comparisons.

**File and Task Reachability:**
Attachment classification: `reachable`. Task classification: `reachable`. All six manifest attachments were inspected: `g3_report.md`, `g2_report.md`, `agent_bundle_r1_final.zip`, `evaluator_materials_r1.zip`, `final_task_spec_SUBMISSION.md`, and `response_to_review.md`. Both ZIP archives are complete, readable, unencrypted, traversal-free, and free of unsafe entry types. The agent archive contains exactly 13 declared files; the evaluator archive contains the keys, scoring materials, notes, provenance, and instruction source. All PDFs parsed successfully, contain no JavaScript or embedded files, and total 230 pages; C01 and C04 are genuinely image-only and representative pages, including redaction-heavy pages, are visually legible. The DOCX/XLSX containers parsed successfully and contain no macros, external links, or embedded executables. Templates expose five tracker rows and nine portfolio rows, and the keys populate all 90 field cells, five amendment mappings, and nine portfolio answers. No attachment was wholly unreviewed; the full legal analysis of every contract page was not independently re-performed. Uploaded scoring programs were inspected as text and not executed, so the contributor’s smoke-test claim was not independently reproduced. Public-source provenance was documented but not externally verified because submitted links were not followed. The completion path is coherent: OCR the two scans, map amendments from document content, populate the tracker and portfolio workbook, then evaluate both against the frozen keys using the supplied configuration. License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor. Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.

**Special Screening:**
None

**Recommended Changes:**
The revised task resolves the prior material concerns and requires no further changes. As optional housekeeping, remove stale references to the retired risk key from the specification’s packaging list and update the historical guessing/self-test prose so it no longer implies that the risk artifact remains part of the current task.