{"claim":{"id":"a40aa581-744b-498c-935a-f8f09a9b6722","submission_id":"350f51af-4594-48f1-a2e6-7acbebba59bc","submission_revision_id":"6a88f1c5-9083-439a-ab02-cb4d5a51eb50","builder":"builder-01","status":"active","claimed_at":"2026-10-15T14:58:49.264476Z","delivered_at":null,"ended_at":null,"delivery_note":null,"end_reason":null},"task":{"submission_id":"350f51af-4594-48f1-a2e6-7acbebba59bc","submission_revision_id":"6a88f1c5-9083-439a-ab02-cb4d5a51eb50","revision_version":2,"submission_status":"under_review","submitted_at":"2026-08-15T07:02:33.800597Z","submitter_name":"Shuang Liu","submitter_email":"shuangl4@andrew.cmu.edu","task":{"status":"submitted","version":2,"extra_fields":{"difficulty_self_test":{"model":"Claude Opus 4.8, maximum thinking effort","harness":"Claude Code","estimated_score":"5–10%"}},"submitted_at":"2026-08-15T07:02:33.800597+00:00","industry_domain":"Legal — M&A / Contract Due Diligence","task_short_name":"legal_contract_diligence_instance_1","operating_system":"Linux","task_description":"Objective: Perform buyer-side contract due diligence on a 5-agreement portfolio with 3 amendments, producing a completed extraction tracker and answers to 6 portfolio risk questions.\n\nStarting State: A bundle of 13 files — 5 executed commercial agreements as PDFs (contracts/C01.pdf–C05.pdf; two are image-based scans requiring OCR), 3 amendments/side letters with anonymized filenames (amendments/Amendment_01.pdf–Amendment_03.pdf; parent contracts are NOT identified by filename), a detailed extraction schema (diligence_instructions.docx: 9 global conventions, 18 field definitions with closed value sets and normalization tokens), the portfolio questions (portfolio_questions.docx), two output templates (tracker_template.xlsx, portfolio_answers.xlsx), and company_reference.csv identifying the client-side party per contract.\n\nInstructions & Rules: (1) Determine which amendment modifies which base agreement from recitals, party names, dates, and defined terms. (2) Complete the tracker: 18 fields per contract reflecting OPERATIVE terms — the base agreement as modified by applicable amendments — strictly per the schema's conventions (defined handling for silence, redactions, date/period normalization, multi-value formatting, and multi-clause composition rules such as the uncapped-indemnity determination and deemed-assignment classification). (3) Answer the 6 portfolio questions (9 answer sub-rows). All conventions and field rules are in the bundled instructions document; source documents include confidential-treatment redactions and OCR-only files by design. Expert completion time: ~8 hours for a licensed attorney.","software_licensing":"Free/Open Source","evaluation_criteria":null,"verification_method":"Deterministic; a working automated grader (score_task.py + scoring_config_N5.json, included and smoke-tested) implements all rules. (1) TRACKER: amendment-mapping column exact per contract, multi-value cells compared as sets; field cells ≥96% of 90 correct (≤3 wrong), after whitespace/date normalization, multi-value cells as sets, all values from closed sets or defined tokens. (2) PORTFOLIO: all 9 sub-rows exact against portfolio_key.xlsx; Q2b and Q5 are contract-ID sets compared order-insensitively. Overall pass = both tracker checks AND all portfolio rows. Every judgment cell carries a pin-cited rationale in the included answer_key_notes.md; keys frozen after the documented audit protocol (also included).","software_and_version":"LibreOffice 7.x (Calc + Writer) and Tesseract OCR 5.x (fully open-source path; Microsoft Excel/Word and Adobe Acrobat are optional commercial equivalents). Python 3.10+ for the included scoring harness. Code-execution capability required (xlsx outputs cannot be produced by file-write alone).","specific_requirements":null,"expected_completion_time":null},"files":[{"file_id":"d43a5251-1201-42e8-aacf-0dbf2a038b10","filename":"g3_report.md","category":"difficulty_self_test_evidence","content_type":"text/markdown","size_bytes":13305},{"file_id":"94692e87-418b-4f7f-8a8c-ef657b252db9","filename":"g2_report.md","category":"difficulty_self_test_evidence","content_type":"text/markdown","size_bytes":16059},{"file_id":"877aab1a-66ee-45d2-9c3e-7c060cafc252","filename":"agent_bundle_r1_final.zip","category":"input_materials","content_type":"application/zip","size_bytes":46858052},{"file_id":"9d5863da-8d59-44a2-a0e4-b7bbad7c6222","filename":"evaluator_materials_r1.zip","category":"reference_output","content_type":"application/zip","size_bytes":49459},{"file_id":"4bc6b53f-9054-4c2f-874f-8226f30df700","filename":"final_task_spec_SUBMISSION.md","category":"reference_output","content_type":"text/markdown","size_bytes":12221},{"file_id":"275a5e6f-8c97-4ebc-929c-2038d57e1dfa","filename":"response_to_review.md","category":"reference_output","content_type":"text/markdown","size_bytes":2570}],"deep_review":{"overall_verdict":"Accept","review_text":"**Overall Verdict:** Accept — The submission is complete, professionally rigorous, and end-to-end reachable; only negligible historical references to the retired risk deliverable remain.\n\n**Completeness Check:**\n- Instruction: Complete — The instructions define nine global conventions, 18 extraction fields, amendment reconciliation, two required workbooks, and nine portfolio answer rows.\n- Inputs: Complete — The agent bundle contains the declared five agreements, three amendments, instructions, questions, templates, and company reference.\n- Toolchain: Complete — LibreOffice, Tesseract, and Python with the open-source `openpyxl` dependency provide a viable Linux workflow without network access or commercial software.\n- Reference output: Complete — Frozen tracker and portfolio keys are present, populated, structurally compatible with the templates, and supported by clause-cited adjudication notes and provenance records.\n- Rubric: Complete — The scoring script and configuration objectively cover exact amendment mapping, the 90-cell extraction threshold, and all nine portfolio rows, including order-insensitive set comparisons.\n\n**File and Task Reachability:**\nAttachment classification: `reachable`. Task classification: `reachable`. All six manifest attachments were inspected: `g3_report.md`, `g2_report.md`, `agent_bundle_r1_final.zip`, `evaluator_materials_r1.zip`, `final_task_spec_SUBMISSION.md`, and `response_to_review.md`. Both ZIP archives are complete, readable, unencrypted, traversal-free, and free of unsafe entry types. The agent archive contains exactly 13 declared files; the evaluator archive contains the keys, scoring materials, notes, provenance, and instruction source. All PDFs parsed successfully, contain no JavaScript or embedded files, and total 230 pages; C01 and C04 are genuinely image-only and representative pages, including redaction-heavy pages, are visually legible. The DOCX/XLSX containers parsed successfully and contain no macros, external links, or embedded executables. Templates expose five tracker rows and nine portfolio rows, and the keys populate all 90 field cells, five amendment mappings, and nine portfolio answers. No attachment was wholly unreviewed; the full legal analysis of every contract page was not independently re-performed. Uploaded scoring programs were inspected as text and not executed, so the contributor’s smoke-test claim was not independently reproduced. Public-source provenance was documented but not externally verified because submitted links were not followed. The completion path is coherent: OCR the two scans, map amendments from document content, populate the tracker and portfolio workbook, then evaluate both against the frozen keys using the supplied configuration. License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor. Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.\n\n**Special Screening:**\nNone\n\n**Recommended Changes:**\nThe revised task resolves the prior material concerns and requires no further changes. As optional housekeeping, remove stale references to the retired risk key from the specification’s packaging list and update the historical guessing/self-test prose so it no longer implies that the risk artifact remains part of the current task.","reviewed_at":"2026-08-15T07:09:12.170075Z"},"claim":{"id":"a40aa581-744b-498c-935a-f8f09a9b6722","submission_id":"350f51af-4594-48f1-a2e6-7acbebba59bc","submission_revision_id":"6a88f1c5-9083-439a-ab02-cb4d5a51eb50","builder":"builder-01","status":"active","claimed_at":"2026-10-15T14:58:49.264476Z","delivered_at":null,"ended_at":null,"delivery_note":null,"end_reason":null}},"revision_is_current":true}