**Overall Verdict:** Accept — the submission is complete and end-to-end viable, with only reviewer-tooling uncertainty around the proprietary Figma canvas internals.

**Completeness Check:**
- Instruction: Complete — clearly defines four HTML views, source pages, editable implementation requirements, prohibited raster techniques, dimensions, and verification criteria.
- Inputs: Complete — `主页.fig` is present as a valid, unencrypted ZIP containing `canvas.fig`, metadata, thumbnail, and embedded image references; its internal Figma canvas records could not be semantically decoded locally.
- Toolchain: Complete — Figma web, Chrome, HTML/CSS/SVG/JavaScript, and a local HTTP server provide a feasible single-machine workflow.
- Reference output: Complete — `page1.html`, `page2.html`, `page3-left.html`, `page3-right.html`, `styles.css`, and `app.js` are present, readable, and consistent with the declared roles.
- Rubric: Complete — specifies HTTP success, parsing, console behavior, dimensions, text fidelity, prohibited elements, fixed rendering conditions, SSIM, and pixel-error thresholds.

**File and Task Reachability:**
Attachment classification: `partially_reachable`; all 13 manifest attachments were downloaded and inspected, with manifest byte counts matching the downloads. I inspected `主页.fig`, all six reference-output files (`page1.html`, `page2.html`, `page3-left.html`, `page3-right.html`, `styles.css`, `app.js`), and all six difficulty-self-test files with those same names. The Figma archive passed integrity testing, contained no unsafe paths or encryption, and its PNG members were identified and visually inspected, including the calendar reference. The proprietary `canvas.fig` binary’s semantic records remain unreviewed because no local Figma parser was available. HTML structure, UTF-8 validity, CSS balance, and JavaScript syntax were checked; browser execution, local-server HTTP checks, and visual scoring were not performed in this review. The declared path remains reachable: a contributor can open the supplied file in Figma web, implement the four editable pages, serve them locally, and have them evaluated against the stated fixture and thresholds.

License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor.

Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.

**Special Screening:**
None.

**Recommended Changes:**
The submission provides a coherent input, toolchain, reference-output contract, and objective evaluation path. No material changes are required; the individual frame bounds should be rechecked in Figma before formal execution as already required by the task.