**Overall Verdict:** Strong Accept — The submission is complete, internally coherent, computationally feasible, and supported by strong reference, provenance, and offline evaluation evidence.

**Completeness Check:**
- Instruction: Complete — The engineering objective, physical conventions, mesh study, convergence logic, production selection, and six-artifact end state are precise.
- Inputs: Complete — `study.json` provides the controlling specification, and the OpenFOAM base case supplies consistent flow, turbulence, boundary, solver, and decomposition settings while appropriately leaving mesh construction to the contributor.
- Toolchain: Complete — OpenFOAM v2406, Linux, a pinned container recipe, initialization script, resource envelope, and required staging locations are supplied; the recorded 44-minute reference execution establishes single-machine feasibility.
- Reference output: Complete — All six expected artifacts are present and internally checksummed, including 100 analytic geometry rows, five mesh records, 1,500 qualified history rows, 15 study rows, and 1,230 production wall-face records.
- Rubric: Complete — The evaluator enforces exact artifacts and schemas, analytic geometry, mesh counts and quality, residuals and stationarity, persistent refinement selection, production coefficient envelopes, wall coverage, surface geometry and Cp, and independent force and moment closure.

**File and Task Reachability:**
The attachment classification is `reachable`, and the end-to-end task classification is `reachable`. Both `naca4512_ale_input_materials.zip` and `naca4512_ale_reference_and_evaluation.zip` were inspected. Their declared byte counts matched, both were valid unencrypted ZIP containers with modest expansion, and their internal checksum manifests verified every member. No traversal paths, links, device entries, encryption barriers, or unsafe archive structure were found.

The inspection covered `study.json`, the OpenFOAM initial fields and dictionaries, `Dockerfile`, `openfoam.sh`, environment and licensing documentation, all six reference outputs, `calibration.json`, `test_outputs.py`, `test.sh`, the hidden reference CSVs, provenance records, oracle implementation source, and authoring-control evidence. Executable-marked files were inspected only as text and were not run. No material content was left unreviewed. The hidden coefficient and surface reference CSVs are byte-identical to their corresponding expert outputs.

Independent parsing confirmed finite values, exact schemas and coverage, analytic geometry accuracy within floating-point noise, required mesh counts and quality margins, 15 consecutive stationary histories satisfying all residual limits, correct adjacent-grid calculations and Level-5 production selection, adequate y+ coverage, unique and correctly oriented surface geometry, and load-closure errors inside every tolerance. Protected reference and evaluator material is separated from the contributor-visible input bundle. External registry availability was not queried under the evidence-only review boundary, but the declared open-source toolchain presents no evidenced access barrier.

License keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor. Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.

**Special Screening:**
None

**Recommended Changes:**
The submission already provides unusually strong specification, calibration, provenance, negative-control, and reproducibility evidence. No changes are required.