{"submission_id":"699ca03a-ddd9-4b6a-bc8c-f1d4e0e76559","submission_revision_id":"99cc0515-0591-4997-98fe-d1106ff30f3d","revision_version":4,"submission_status":"under_review","submitted_at":"2026-08-25T13:27:07.887812Z","submitter_name":"Hyunjun Kim","submitter_email":"mnb9227@gmail.com","task":{"status":"submitted","version":4,"extra_fields":{},"submitted_at":"2026-08-25T13:27:07.887812+00:00","industry_domain":"Mechanical Engineering / CAD (Drawing Revision Release)","task_short_name":"cad_revision_release","operating_system":"Linux","task_description":"Goal: Produce the Rev-B drawing release (DXF, BOM, report) from the Rev-A drawing set and a customer ECN.\n\nRemote workspace:\n- Task folder: cad_revision_release\n- Read ALL of `input/spec_sheet.md` and `input/ecn_2214.txt` first — every requirement there is enforced by QC.\n\nInputs (under `input/`):\n- `drawing_rev_a.dxf` — current released drawing (millimetres): dimension texts on layer DIMS, callout bubbles on CALLOUT, revision block on REVBLOCK, datums on DATUM, sheet title on BORDER; housing outline geometry on OUTLINE is unchanged by this ECN.\n- `bom_rev_a.csv` — current bill of materials.\n- `ecn_2214.txt` — the change notice. WARNING: change 3 quotes D3 in INCHES on a millimetre drawing.\n- `spec_sheet.md` — mandatory release spec.\n\nWhat to do:\n- Apply all five dimension changes (D3 converted from inches to millimetres; values to 2 decimals; the five DIMS texts remain one per tag D1..D5).\n- Keep the DXF drawing-unit declaration at millimetres ($INSUNITS = 4) — the sheet, title block and ECN are all in millimetres, so any other unit declaration (or none) fails the release.\n- Verify the stack-up GAP = D4 - (D1 + D2 + D3) stays within [0.50, 2.00] mm; the release is invalid otherwise.\n- Preserve the housing geometry on layer OUTLINE EXACTLY as released in Rev A (same entity types and coordinates — QC compares the OUTLINE layer against the source drawing; deleted or reshaped housing geometry fails the release).\n- Update the BOM to EXACTLY four rows (items 1-4, no extras/duplicates) under the exact header `item,part,desc,qty`: item 2 P-2043 -> P-2043B qty 6, item 3 P-3108 -> P-3108S qty 2, item 4 qty 16; keep item 1. Descriptions: replaced parts carry the ECN wording, unchanged parts keep the Rev-A wording verbatim.\n- Update callout bubbles to EXACTLY the four Rev-B BOM parts — each CALLOUT text must be EXACTLY one part number (full string; no extra, duplicate, or junk-suffixed callout texts).\n- Add the REV B row to the revision block (ECN-2214, a nonempty one-line description, 2026-08-20) while keeping the REV A row verbatim as released (not paraphrased).\n- Update the sheet title block (BORDER) from REV A to REV B — a stale REV A title fails the release.\n- Keep datum symbols A, B, C in order (top-to-bottom) on layer DATUM.\n- Write `output/revision_report.txt` stating every change explicitly as before -> after: each dimension as `D<k>: <old> -> <new>`, the gap computation `GAP = D4 - (D1+D2+D3) = <value> mm -> PASS` (or `-> FAIL` outside [0.50, 2.00] mm — the arrow verdict word is required), and an `item N: <old part> -> <new part>; qty <old> -> <new>` line for EVERY BOM item (unchanged items repeat the same value on both sides).\n\nOutput:\n- `output/drawing_rev_b.dxf`\n- `output/bom_rev_b.csv`\n- `output/revision_report.txt`","software_licensing":"Free/Open Source","evaluation_criteria":null,"verification_method":"Deterministic QC evaluation (ezdxf; evaluation/ is self-contained — evaluate.py plus dxf_readers.py, its own drawing readers, OUTLINE-signature comparator and stack-up gate bounds, so it runs exactly as packaged with no other local dependencies). Malformed or unparsable numbers in the report degrade only the affected component to 0, and malformed drawing texts or CSV values fail only the affected gates — the evaluator always exits cleanly (rc=0, no crash) on any input shape.\n\nMaterials provenance: the REV A drawing, its BOM and the ECN are synthesized in-house for this benchmark (a representative engineering-change-release scenario; no third-party CAD data). The package carries no third-party rights and is publishable under CC BY 4.0. Every QC-enforced output schema (BOM columns, report rows) is documented in input/spec_sheet.md, which the agent receives with the inputs.\n\nHard gates (any failure => score 0):\n- All three output files exist\n- The DXF loads cleanly through the ezdxf auditor with all five required layers, and declares millimetre drawing units ($INSUNITS = 4) — the sheet, title block and ECN are all millimetres, so a metres (or missing) unit declaration fails the release\n- D3 reads 31.75 mm (the inch conversion gate — the unit slip this task exists to test), and the five DIMS texts carry exactly the tag set D1..D5 — five well-formed texts with any other tag set (e.g. a D6 label replacing a required tag) fail the release before any stack-up is computed\n- Exactly five DIMS texts, each in the required `D<k> <value>` two-decimal format\n- The OUTLINE housing geometry matches the Rev-A source EXACTLY (entity types and coordinates compared through a canonical layer signature — a release that deletes or reshapes the housing fails)\n- The revision block contains a REV B row referencing ECN-2214 with the 2026-08-20 date — checked field-wise on the REV|ECO|DESCRIPTION|DATE row form: the ECO field is ECN-2214 and the date field 2026-08-20; a foreign ECN number merely mentioned inside the description text does not count. The retained REV A row appears VERBATIM as released, and the REV B row carries a nonempty one-line description field\n- The sheet title (BORDER) carries the exact revision token REV B (a longer string merely containing it, e.g. REV Bx, does not count) — a stale REV A title fails the release\n- Datum symbols read A, B, C top-to-bottom on layer DATUM\n- The BOM carries the byte-exact header `item,part,desc,qty`, is exactly four rows (items 1-4, expected parts and quantities; no extra or duplicate rows — item and qty cells are plain integers, so int()-parseable padding such as \" 6\" is rejected), and descriptions are exact (replaced parts carry the ECN wording, unchanged parts keep the Rev-A wording)\n- Callout bubbles are exactly the four Rev-B parts, each CALLOUT text being EXACTLY one part number (full string; no extras, duplicates or junk suffixes)\n\nScored components (weighted sum after gates, clamped to <= 1.0; drawing dimensions resolve 0.01 mm, so numeric cross-checks work at the drawing's own precision):\n- All 5 dimension values match the expected Rev-B values exactly (weight 0.25)\n- Tolerance stack-up GAP in [0.50, 2.00] mm computed from the delivered drawing (weight 0.15)\n- Report gap line 'GAP = D4 - (D1+D2+D3) = <value> mm -> PASS/FAIL' matches the DXF-derived gap within 0.001 mm, with the verdict word on that SAME line agreeing with the recomputed tolerance check (weight 0.2)\n- Every reported dimension 'D<k>: <old> -> <new>' matches the drawing on BOTH sides of the arrow — old values against the released Rev-A drawing, new values against the delivered Rev-B drawing (weight 0.15)\nDocumented representation tolerances (verified by probe, kept by design): a utf-8 BOM or CRLF line endings on the BOM CSV keep full credit (opened as utf-8-sig with newline=\"\"), integer cells with leading zeros (\"06\") count as the same integer, and the delivered DXF may be any version from R2000 (AC1015) upward that still carries $INSUNITS and LWPOLYLINE — an R12 (AC1009) downgrade fails because that format can declare neither the millimetre unit nor the outline polylines. An empty revision_report.txt keeps only the geometry credit (0.4) by design: the report is scored, not format-gated.\n- An explicit before -> after BOM delta line for every item, numerically correct (weight 0.25)\n\nSanity checks run by the contributor (logs in this package: build_log.txt, naive_log.txt, selftest_review_log.txt): the reference scores 1.0 (GAP = 1.500 mm); a literal ECN application leaving D3 = 1.250 scores 0.0; a straight copy of Rev A scores 0.0; targeted negatives — a stale REV A sheet title, an extra BOM row with a matching extra callout, reordered datums, a token-only report, deleted OUTLINE circles, a junk-suffixed callout text, a replaced part keeping its Rev-A description, a tampered report before-value, a one-decimal dimension text, an unparseable dimension number, a title reading REV Bx instead of the exact token, a dimension label replaced by D6 (tag set not D1..D5 — the evaluator computes the stack-up only behind the tag-set gate, with guarded lookups throughout), and a DXF declaring metres ($INSUNITS = 6) instead of millimetres — are rejected at 0.0 or lose the affected component.\n","software_and_version":"Python 3.12 + ezdxf 1.4 (DXF R2010 revision editing)","specific_requirements":null,"expected_completion_time":null},"files":[{"file_id":"05a5423e-daa2-4b3a-ae19-00d0fc67d9dd","filename":"05_upload_inputs.zip","category":"input_materials","content_type":"application/x-zip-compressed","size_bytes":10219},{"file_id":"bb524101-d491-4a57-af0a-f5822182cad8","filename":"05_upload_reference.zip","category":"reference_output","content_type":"application/x-zip-compressed","size_bytes":29439}],"deep_review":{"overall_verdict":"Accept","review_text":"**Overall Verdict:** Accept — The submission is complete, safely reachable, internally consistent, and objectively evaluable; only narrow, nonmaterial evaluator-hardening opportunities remain.\n\n**Completeness Check:**\n- Instruction: Complete — The required DXF, BOM, and report changes, units, stack-up bounds, preservation rules, formats, and output locations are explicit and consistent.\n- Inputs: Complete — The Rev-A DXF, four-row BOM, ECN, and release specification are readable and contain all facts needed to produce Rev B.\n- Toolchain: Complete — Python 3.12 and open-source ezdxf 1.4 on Linux provide a practical single-machine workflow without external services.\n- Reference output: Complete — The reference DXF, BOM, and report consistently implement the ECN, including the 31.75 mm conversion and 1.500 mm passing gap.\n- Rubric: Complete — The supplied evaluator defines hard gates, weighted partial credit, guarded malformed-input handling, outline comparison, and extensive positive and negative test evidence.\n\n**File and Task Reachability:**\nThe attachment set is `reachable`, and the end-to-end task is `reachable`. Both declared ZIP files matched their manifest sizes, were unencrypted, passed container integrity checks, contained only regular traversal-free members, and had modest expansion sizes. All content was inspected: `05_upload_inputs.zip` contained `bom_rev_a.csv`, `drawing_rev_a.dxf`, `ecn_2214.txt`, and `spec_sheet.md`; `05_upload_reference.zip` contained the three reference outputs, both evaluator source files, all three naive-attempt files, `task_card.json`, and the three build/evaluation logs. No content was left unreviewed.\n\nThe CSV and text files use readable ASCII or UTF-8 with valid four-column BOM schemas. The DXFs identify as R2010, declare millimeters, contain the required layer tables and expected text entities, and preserve the seven raw OUTLINE geometry entities between revisions. The reviewer environment lacked Python, so the DXFs could not be independently audited through ezdxf; non-executing group-code inspection was completed, while the supplied logs report clean ezdxf audits and comprehensive evaluator results. Solver-visible inputs are separated from reference and evaluator evidence. A solver can edit the Rev-A drawing and BOM using the declared toolchain, generate the three outputs, and receive deterministic gate and weighted-score evaluation.\n\nLicense keys, accounts, tokens, and other credentials are not required from the contributor. Confidential, proprietary, or internal material may be evaluated as submitted evidence without requiring additional disclosure.\n\n**Special Screening:**\nNone — no affirmative evidence supports a screening label. Public identifiability was not independently searched because approved search capability was unavailable.\n\n**Recommended Changes:**\nThe submission includes coherent artifacts, a correct reference release, and broad negative-test coverage. No material changes are required. Optional evaluator hardening would bind the nonempty description check to the same Rev-B row carrying the required ECN and date, and enforce the documented two-decimal format in report dimension rows.","reviewed_at":"2026-08-25T13:34:11.149848Z"},"claim":null}